BLACK TUESDAY HOME PAGE
Real Eyes 1 American Nightmare
Real Eyes 2 Psychological Element
Real Eyes 3 BOOKS : Will they ever trust us again?
** You are Here... Real Eyes 4
YOU'RE FIRED...NOT!
Real Eyes 5 Wallow In Chaos, And Laugh
Real Eyes 6 Michael Moore First Thoughts and KERRY WON
The Election 2004 was Hacked!
GROKKING REAL EYES
November 2 2004
YOU'RE FIRED... NOT!
WAR AGAINST HUMANITY
This is the day of the greatest criminal attact against the United states.
Make the coffee, print this out and take it with you as you VOTE!
The "Criminalization of the State", is when war criminals legitimately
occupy
positions of authority, which enable them to decide "who are the
criminals",
when in fact they are the criminals.
2000, the George W. Bush-Dick Cheney syndicate seized the presidency of the United States, and world power, in an act of open and brazen criminality.
Experienced followers of this cabal sounded the alarm, warning of the carnage that was certain to come. We warned that the failure to resist every act and
manifestation of this coup would hasten the death of a crippled American republic.
Few listened
A precondition for breaking the legitimacy of the Bush Administration is to fully reveal its links to international terrorism and its complicity in the
tragic event of 9/11.
See what bushit really thinks of you
The 9-11 bombings Are Not Acts of War
The 9-11 bombings Are Crimes Against Humanity
Crimes against Humanity
*********************************
Text of Michel Chossudovsky's keynote presentation at the opening plenarysession
(27 May 2004) to The International Citizens Inquiry Into 9/11, Toronto, 25-30 May 2004.
"Revealing the Lies" on 9/11 Perpetuates the "Big Lie"
by Michel Chossudovsky
The Bush administration had numerous intelligence warnings. "Revealing
the
lies" of Bush officials regarding these "intelligence warnings" has
served to
uphold Al Qaeda as the genuine threat, as an "outside enemy", which
threatens
the security of America, when in fact Al Qaeda is a creation of the US
intelligence apparatus.
America’s leaders in Washington and Wall Street firmly believe in the
righteousness of war and authoritarian forms of government as a means
to
"safeguarding democratic values".
9/11 is the justification.
According to Homeland Security "the near-term attacks will either rival
or
exceed the 9/11 attacks".
An actual "terrorist attack" on American soil would lead to the
suspension of
civilian government and the establishment of martial law. In the words
of
Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge: "If we go to Red [code alert]...
it
basically shuts down the country,"
"You ask, 'Is it serious?' Yes, you bet your life. People don't do that
unless
it's a serious situation." (Donald Rumsfeld)
The "Criminalization of the State", is when war criminals legitimately
occupy
positions of authority, which enable them to decide "who are the
criminals",
when in fact they are the criminals.
Michel Chossudovsky is the author of War and Globalization, The Truth
behind September 11
Revealing a lie does not necessarily lead to establishing the truth.
In fact the experience of the 9/11 Commission which has a mandate to
investigate the September 11 attacks has proved exactly the opposite.
We know that the Bush administration had numerous "intelligence
warnings". We
know they had "intelligence" which confirmed that terrorists had the
capacity
of hijacking aircrafts and using them to target buildings.
Attorney General John Ashcroft had apparently been warned in August
2001 by the
FBI to avoid commercial airlines, but this information was not made
public.
See Eric Smith
The Pentagon had conducted a full fledged exercise on an airplane
crashing into
the Pentagon
We also know that senior Bush officials including Donald Rumsfeld and
Condoleezza Rice lied under oath to the 9/11 commission, when they
stated that
they had no information or forewarning of impending terrorist attacks.
But we also know, from carefully documented research that:
There were stand-down orders on 9/11. The US Air force did not INTERVENE.
Also see... Szamuely
There was a cover-up of the WTC and Pentagon investigation. The WTC
rubble was
confiscated.
See
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAN309A.html" target="http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com">Bill Manning
The plane debris at the Pentagon disappeared.
See Theirry Meyssan
In the first minutes following the first attack on the World Trade
Center,
officials suggested to the media that the person behind the attacks was
Osama
bn Laden, the epitome of Muslim fanaticism. Not long after, the
recently
appointed director of the FBI, Robert Mueller III, designated nineteen
kamikazes by name and mobilized all the means at the disposal of his
agency to
track down their accomplices.
The FBI thus never undertook any investigation but, instead, organized
a man
hunt, which, in the eyes much of the United States public, quickly took
on the
appearance of an Arab hunt. This reached such a pitch that people were
incited
to attack – even kill – Arabs whom they naively considered collectively
responsible for the attacks.
There was no investigation by Congress, which, at the request of the
White
House, renounced exercising its constitutional role, supposedly in
order not to
adversely affect national security. Nor was there investigation by any
media
representatives, who had been summoned to the White House and prevailed
upon to
abstain from following up any leads lest such inquiries also adversely
affect
national security.
If we analyze the attacks of September the eleventh, we notice first
off that
there was much more to them than the official version acknowledges.
1.We know about only four planes, whereas at one point it was a
question of
eleven planes. Further, an examination of the insider-trading conducted
in
relation to the attacks shows put-option speculative trading in the
stock of
three airline companies: American Airlines, United Airlines and KLM
Royal Dutch
Airlines. 2.The official version does not include the attack on the
White House
annex, the Old Executive Office Building (called the "Eisenhower
Building").
Yet, on the morning of the eleventh, ABC television broadcast, live,
pictures
of a fire ravaging the presidential services building. 3.Neither does
the
official version take into account the collapse of a third building in
Manhattan World Trade Center complex, independently of the twin towers.
This
third building was not hit by a plane. However, it, too, was ravaged by
a fire
before collapsing for an unknown reason. This building contained the
world's
biggest secret CIA operations base, where the Agency engaged in
economic
intelligence gathering that the military-industrial lobby considered a
waste of
resources that should have been devoted to strategic intelligence
gathering.
If we look closely at the attack against the Pentagon, we notice that
the
official version amounts to an enormous lie.
According to the Defense Department, a Boeing 757, all trace of which
had been
lost somewhere over Ohio, flew some 500 kilometers (300 miles) without
being
noticed. It supposedly entered Pentagon air space and descended on to
the lawn
surrounding the heliport, bounced off the lawn, broke a wing in
collision with
an electric transformer station, hit the façade at the level of the
ground
floor and first story, and was totally consumed by fire, leaving no
other
traces than two dysfunctional black boxes and pieces of passengers'
bodies.
It is obviously impossible that a Boeing 757 could, for some 500
kilometers,
escape detection by civil and military radar, by fighter-bomber planes
sent in
pursuit of it and by observation satellites that had just been
activated.
It is also obviously impossible that a Boeing 757 could enter the
Pentagon's
air space without being destroyed by one or more of the five missile
batteries
protecting the building.
When one examines the photographs of the façade, taken in the minutes
following
the attack (even before the Arlington civilian fire fighters had time
to
deploy), one sees no trace of the right wing on fire in front of the
façade,
nor any hole in the façade into which the plane could have been
swallowed up.
Apparently without the least fear of laying itself open to ridicule,
the
Defense Department declared that the jet engines, made out of tempered
steel,
had disintegrated under the shock of the impact – without damaging the
façade.
The aluminum of the fuselage is claimed to have combusted at more than
2,500°
Celsius within the building and to have been transformed into gas, but
the
bodies of the passengers which it contained were so little burned that
they
were later identified from their finger prints.
Responding to journalists during a press conference at the Pentagon,
the fire
chief claimed that "no voluminous debris from the aircraft" had
remained, "nor
any piece of the fuselage, nor anything of that sort". He declared that
neither
he nor his men knew what had become of the aircraft.
Close examination of the official photographs of the scene of the
attack, taken
and published by the Defense Department, shows that no part of the
Pentagon
bears any mark of an impact that could be attributed to the crash of a
Boeing
757.
One must acknowledged the evidence: it is impossible that the attack
against
the Pentagon on September 11, killing 125 persons, was carried out by a
jet
airliner.
The scene of the attack was thoroughly disturbed on the following day
by the
immediate launch of new construction work, with the result that many of
the
elements necessary to reconstruct what had happened are missing. The
elements
that do remain, however, converge in a single hypothesis that it is not
possible to prove with certainty.
An air traffic controller from Washington has testified seeing on radar
an
object flying at about 800 kilometers per hour, moving initially toward
the
White House, then turning sharply toward the Pentagon, where it seemed
to
crash. The air traffic controller has testified that the
characteristics of the
flight were such that it could only have been a military projectile.
Several hundred witnesses have claimed that they head "a shrill noise
like the
noise of a fighter-bomber", but nothing like the noise of a civilian
aircraft.
Eye-witnesses have said that they saw "something like a cruise missile
with
wings" or a small flying object "like a plane carrying eight or twelve
persons".
The flying object penetrated the building without causing major damage
to the
façade. It crossed several of the building rings of the Pentagon,
creating in
each wall it pierced a progressively bigger hole.
The final hole, perfectly circular, measured about one meter eighty in
diameter. When traversing the first ring of the Pentagon, the object
set off a
fire, as gigantic as it was sudden. Huge flames burst from the building
licking
the façades, then they shrank back just as fast, leaving behind a cloud
of
black soot. The fire spread through a part of the first ring and along
two
perpendicular corridors. It was so sudden that the fire protection
system could
not react.
All these testimonies and observations correspond to the effects of an
AGM[air
to ground missile]-86C of the third (most recent) generation of CALCM
[conventional air launched cruise missile -- see picture at
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/agm-86c.htm], equipped with
depleted
uranium warheads and guided by GPS [global positioning system]. This
type of
missile, seen from the side, would easily remind one of a small
civilian
airplane, but it is not a plane. It produces a shrill whistle
comparable to
that of a fighter-bomber, can be guided with enough accuracy to be
directed
through a window, can pierce the most resistant armor and can set off a
fire –
independent of its piercing effect – that will generate heat of over
2,000°
Celsius.
This type of missile was developed jointly by the Navy and the Air
Force and is
fired from a plane. The missile used against the Pentagon destroyed the
part of
the building where the new Supreme Naval Command Center was being
installed.
Following the attack, the Navy Chief of Staff, Admiral Vernon Walters,
failed
to show up in the crisis room of the National Military Joint
Intelligence
Center when the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff reported
there.
Instead, he abruptly left the Pentagon.
Who, then, could have fired such a missile on the Pentagon? The answer
was
given by the off-the-record revelations of Ari Fleischer, the White
House
spokesman, and by Karl Rove, senior advisor to the president, to
journalists
from the New York Times and the Washington Post.
Eighteen days later, these men discounted the veracity of the
information they
had given the journalists, claiming that they had been speaking under
the
stress of great emotion.
According to those close to George W. Bush, in the course of the
morning, the
Secret Service received a telephone call from those behind the attacks,
apparently in order to make demands. To give credence to their demands,
the
masterminds revealed the secret codes giving access to the secure
telephone
lines available to the president for secure communication with the
various
intelligence agencies and services as well as for access to the nuclear
arsenal. In fact, only a very few persons with the highest security
clearances,
in the top ranks of the government, could have had these codes. It
follows that
at least one of the persons behind the attacks of September 11 has a
top
government post, either civilian or military.
To give credence to the fable of Islamic terrorists, the United States
authorities invented kamikazes.
Although it would have been possible for a well organized group of
persons to
bring fire arms into commercial air liners, the kamikazes apparently
used
cardboard cutters as their only weapons. They are said to have learned
to pilot
Boeing 757s and 767s in the space of several hours of simulator
training,
becoming better pilots than professionals. This mastery allowed them to
carry
out complex in-flight approach maneuvers.
The Justice Department has never explained how it established the list
of the
kamikazes. The airline companies have furnished the exact number of
passengers
in each plane, and the passenger lists, incomplete, do not mention the
persons
who boarded at the last minute. In checking the these lists, one
notices that
names of the kamikazes are not on them and that only three passengers
are not
identified for flight 11 and only two for flight 93. It is thus
impossible that
19 kamikazes boarded.
Further, several of those listed as kamikazes have turned up, alive.
The FBI
nonetheless maintains that the high-jackers have all been definitively
identified and that complementary information such as birth dates makes
it
improbable that they could be confused with persons of the same name.
For those
who might doubt this, the FBI has a ridiculous proof: whereas the
planes burned
and the twin towers collapsed, the passport of Mohammed Atta was
miraculously
found intact on the smoking ruins of the World Trade Center.
The existence of high-jackers, whether these or others, is confirmed by
telephone calls made by several passengers to members of their
families.
Unfortunately, these conversations are known to us only by hearsay and
have not
been published, even in the case of those that were recorded. Thus, it
has been
impossible to verify that they were actually made from a particular
cell phone
of from a telephone on board. Here, too, we are asked to take the FBI
at its
word.
Further, it was not indispensable to have high-jackers to carry out the
attacks. The Global Hawk technology, developed by the Air Force, makes
it
possible to take control of a commercial airliner regardless of the
intentions
of its pilot(s) and to direct it by remote control.
There remains the case of Osama bn Laden. If it is generally admitted
that he
was a CIA agent or collaborator during the war against the Soviet Union
in
Afghanistan, the current version of events claims that he turned coat
and
became public enemy number one of the United States.
This story does not bear up under scrutiny either. The French daily le
Figaro
revealed that last July, Osmam bn Laden was a patient at the American
hospital
in Dubai, where he was visited by the head of CIA regional office. CBS
television in the United States has revealed that, on September 10,
Osama bn
Laden was undergoing dialysis at the Rawalpindi military hospital,
under the
protection of the Pakistani army. And the renown French journalist
Michel
Peyrard, who was a prisoner of the Taliban, has recounted how, last
November,
Osama bn Laden was living openly in Jalalabad while the United States
was
bombing other regions of the country. It is difficult to believe that
the
greatest army in the world, come to Afghanistan to arrest him, was
unable to do
so, while the mollah Omar was able to escape from United States
military force
on a moped.
In view of the elements that I have just presented, it appears that the
attacks
of September can not be attributed to foreign terrorists from the
Arab-Muslim
world – even if some of those involved might have been Muslim – but to
United
States terrorists.
The day after the attacks of September 11, United Nations Security
Council
Resolution 1368 acknowledged "the inherent right of individual or
collective
self-defense in accordance with the Charter", calling on "all States to
work
together urgently to bring to justice the perpetrators, organizers and
sponsors
of these terrorist attacks and stresses that those responsible for
aiding,
supporting or harboring the perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of
these acts
will be held accountable".
If one wishes to heed the call of the Security Council, to enforce
Resolution
1368 and to punish those who really are guilty, the only way to
accurately
identify the guilty parties is to set up a commission of inquiry whose
independence and objectivity are guaranteed by the United Nations. This
would
also be the only way to preserve international peace.
In the meantime, Your Highness, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, the
foreign
military interventions of the United States of America are devoid of
any basis
in international law, whether it be their recent intervention in
Afghanistan or
their announced interventions in Iran, Iraq and in numerous other
countries.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Massive financial gains were made as a result of 9/11, from insider
trading
leading up to 9/11
See
Michael Ruppert
There is an ongoing financial scam underlying the 7.1 billion dollar
insurance
claim by the WTC leaseholder, following the collapse of the twin towers
See Michel Chossudovsky
Mystery surrounds WTC building 7, which collapsed (or was "pulled" down
in the
afternoon of 9/11 mysteriously (For details see WTC-7:
at Scott Louhrey
The White House is being accused by the critics of "criminal
negligence", for
having casually disregarded the intelligence presented to president
Bush and
his national security team, and for not having acted to prevent the
9/11
terrorist attack.
The unfolding consensus is: "They knew but failed to act".
This line of reasoning is appealing to many 9/11 critics and "Bush
bashers"
because it clearly places the blame on the Bush administration.
Yet in a bitter irony, the very process of revealing these lies and
expressing
public outrage has contributed to reinforcing the 9/11 cover-up.
"Revealing the lies" serves to present Al Qaeda as the genuine threat,
as an
"outside enemy", which threatens the security of America, when in fact
Al Qaeda
is a creation of the US intelligence apparatus.
The presumption is that these forewarnings and intelligence briefs
emanating
from the intelligence establishment constitute a true and unbiased
representation of the terrorist threat.
Meanwhile, the history of Al Qaeda and the CIA has been shoved to the
background. The fact that successive US governments since the
Soviet-Afghan war
have supported and abetted the Islamic terror network is no longer
mentioned,
for obvious reasons. It would break the consensus regarding Al Qaeda as
the
outside enemy of America, which is a crucial building block of the
entire
National Security doctrine.
This central proposition that Islamic terrorists were responsible for
9/11
serves to justify everything else including the Patriot Act, the wars
on
Afghanistan and Iraq, the spiraling defense and homeland security
budgets, the
detention of thousands of people of Muslim faith on trumped up charges,
the
arrest and deportation to Guantanamo of alleged "enemy combatants",
etc.
The Central Role of Al Qaeda in Bush's National Security Doctrine
Spelled out in the National Security Strategy (NSS), the preemptive
"defensive
war" doctrine and the "war on terrorism" against Al Qaeda constitute
the two
essential building blocks of the Pentagon's propaganda campaign.
No Al Qaeda,
No war on terrorism
No rogue States which sponsor Al Qaeda
No pretext for waging war.
No justification for invading and occupying Afghanistan and Iraq
No justification for sending in US special forces into numerous
countries
around the World.
No justification for developing tactical nuclear weapons to be used in
conventional war theaters against Islamic terrorists, who according to
official
statements constitute a nuclear threat.
See
Nuclear threat.
The Administration's post 9/11 nuclear doctrine, points to Al Qaeda as
some
kind of nuclear power.
"The Pentagon must prepare for all possible contingencies, especially
now, when
dozens of countries, and some terrorist groups, are engaged in secret
weapon
development programs." (quoted in William Arkin, Secret Plan Outlines
the
Unthinkable, Los Angeles Times, 9 March 2002)
Central Role of al Qaeda in US Military Doctrine
The very existence of Al Qaeda constitutes the justification for a
pre-emptive
war against rogue states and terrorist organizations. It is part of the
indoctrination of US troops fighting in the Middle East. It is also
being used
to justify the so-called "abuse" of POWs.
The objective is to present "preemptive military action" --meaning war
as an
act of "self-defense" against two categories of enemies, "rogue States"
and
"Islamic terrorists":
"The war against terrorists of global reach is a global enterprise of
uncertain
duration. …America will act against such emerging threats before they
are fully
formed.
…Rogue states and terrorists do not seek to attack us using
conventional means.
They know such attacks would fail. Instead, they rely on acts of terror
and,
potentially, the use of weapons of mass destruction (…)
The targets of these attacks are our military forces and our civilian
population, in direct violation of one of the principal norms of the
law of
warfare. As was demonstrated by the losses on September 11, 2001, mass
civilian
casualties is the specific objective of terrorists and these losses
would be
exponentially more severe if terrorists acquired and used weapons of
mass
destruction.
The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions
to
counter a sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the
threat,
the greater is the risk of inaction- and the more compelling the case
for
taking anticipatory action to defend ourselves, (…). To forestall or
prevent
such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if
necessary, act
preemptively."
National Security Strategy, White House, 2002
To justify pre-emptive military actions, including the use of nuclear
weapons
in conventional war theaters (approved by the Senate in late 2003),
the
National Security Doctrine requires the "fabrication" of a terrorist
threat,
--ie. "an outside enemy." It also needs to link these terrorist threats
to
"State sponsorship" by the so-called "rogue states."
But it also means that the various "massive casualty-producing events"
allegedly by Al Qaeda (the fabricated enemy) are also part of the
propaganda
ploy which consists in upholding the Legend of an outside enemy.
9/11 and War Propaganda
In other words, the forewarnings sustain the Al Qaeda legend, which
constitutes
the cornerstone of the "war on terrorism". And the latter serves as a
justification for America's "pre-emptive wars" with a view to
"protecting the
homeland".
One year before 9/11, the Project for a New American Century (PNAC)
called for
"some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor,"
which would
serve to galvanize US public opinion in support of a war agenda.
See http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/NAC304A.html
The PNAC architects seem to have anticipated with cynical accuracy, the
use of
the September 11 attacks as "a war pretext incident."
The PNAC's declared objective is "Defend the Homeland'' and "Fight and
decisively win in multiple, simultaneous theater wars", perform global
constabulary funcitons including punitive military actions around the
World,
and the so-called "revolution in military affairs", essentially meaning
the
development of a new range of sophisticated weaponry including the
militarisation of outer space,the development of a new generation of
nuclear
weapons, etc.
on nuclear weapons see:
Nuclear Weapons
OR, on the
PNAC
The PNAC's reference to a "catastrophic and catalyzing event" echoes a
similar
statement by David Rockefeller to the United Nations Business Council
in 1994:
"We are on the verge of global transformation. All we need is the right
major
crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
Similarly, in the words Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book, The Grand
Chessboard:.
"…it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus [in America] on
foreign
policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and
widely
perceived direct external threat."
Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was National Security Adviser to President
Jimmy
Carter was one of the key architects of the Al Qaeda network, created
by the
CIA at the onslaught of the Soviet Afghan war (1979-1989). (See
Brzezinski at
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.print.html )
The "catastrophic and catalyzing event" as stated by the PNAC is an
integral
part of US military-intelligence planning. General Franks, who led the
military
campaign into Iraq, pointed recently (October 2003) to the role of a
"massive
casualty-producing event" to muster support for the imposition of
military rule
in America.
See General Tommy Franks calls for Repeal of US
Constitution,
November 2003
Franks identifies the precise scenario whereby military rule will be
established:
"a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event [will occur] somewhere
in the
Western world - it may be in the United States of America - that causes
our
population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize
our
country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing
event."
(Ibid)
This statement from an individual, who was actively involved in
military and
intelligence planning at the highest levels, suggests that the
"militarisation
of our country" is an ongoing operational assumption. It is part of the
broader
"Washington consensus". It identifies the Bush administration's
"roadmap" of
war and "Homeland Defense." Needless to say, it is also an integral
part of the
neoliberal agenda.
The "terrorist massive casualty-producing event" is presented by
General Franks
as a crucial political turning point. The resulting crisis and social
turmoil
are intended to facilitate a major shift in US political, social and
institutional structures.
General Franks' statement reflects a consensus within the US Military
as to how
events ought to unfold. The "war on terrorism" is to provide a
justification
for repealing the Rule of Law, ultimately with a view to "preserving
civil
liberties."
Franks' interview suggests that an Al Qaeda sponsored terrorist attack
will be
used as a "trigger mechanism" for a military coup d'état in America.
The PNAC's
"Pearl Harbor type event" would be used as a justification for
declaring a
State of emergency, leading to the establishment of a military
government.
In many regards, the militarisation of civilian State institutions in
the US is
already functional under the facade of a bogus democracy.
Actual Terrorist Attacks
To be "effective" the fear and disinformation campaign cannot solely
rely on
unsubstantiated "warnings" of future attacks, it also requires "real"
terrorist
occurrences or "incidents", which provide credibility to the
Washington's war
plans. These terrorist events are used to justify the implementation of
"emergency measures" as well as "retaliatory military actions". They
are
required, in the present context, to create the illusion of "an outside
enemy"
that is threatening the American Homeland.
The triggering of "war pretext incidents" is part of the Pentagon's
assumptions. In fact it is an integral part of US military history.(See
Richard
Sanders, War Pretext Incidents, How to Start a War, Global Outlook,
published
in two parts, Issues 2 and 3, 2002-2003).
In 1962, the Joint Chiefs of Staff had envisaged a secret plan entitled
"Operation Northwoods", to deliberately trigger civilian casualties to
justify
the invasion of Cuba:
"We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," "We
could
develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other
Florida
cities and even in Washington" "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would
cause a
helpful wave of national indignation." (See the declassified Top Secret
1962
document titled "Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in
Cuba"16
(See
Operation Northwoods at
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/NOR111A.html ).
There is no evidence that the Pentagon or the CIA played a direct role
in
recent terrorist attacks, including those in Indonesia (2002), India
(2001),
Turkey (2003) and Saudi Arabia (2003).
According to the reports, the attacks were undertaken by organizations
(or
cells of these organizations), which operate quite independently, with
a
certain degree of autonomy. This independence is in the very nature of
a covert
intelligence operation. The «intelligence asset» is not in direct
contact with
its covert sponsors. It is not necessarily cognizant of the role it
plays on
behalf of its intelligence sponsors.
The fundamental question is who is behind them? Through what sources
are they
being financed? What is the underlying network of ties?
For instance, in the case of the 2002 Bali bomb attack, the alleged
terrorist
organization Jemaah Islamiah had links to Indonesia's military
intelligence
(BIN), which in turn has links to the CIA and Australian intelligence.
The December 2001 terrorist attacks on the Indian Parliament --which
contributed to pushing India and Pakistan to the brink of war-- were
allegedly
conducted by two Pakistan-based rebel groups, Lashkar-e-Taiba ("Army of
the
Pure") and Jaish-e-Muhammad ("Army of Mohammed"), both of which
according to
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) are supported by Pakistan's ISI.
See Council on Foreign Relations
2002).
What the CFR fails to acknowledge is the crucial relationship between
the ISI
and the CIA and the fact that the ISI continues to support Lashkar,
Jaish and
the militant Jammu and Kashmir Hizbul Mujahideen (JKHM), while also
collaborating with the CIA.
(For further details see Michel
Chossudovsky,
Fabricating an Enemy, March 2003,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO301B.html )
A 2002 classified outbrief drafted to guide the Pentagon "calls for the
creation of a so-called 'Proactive, Pre-emptive Operations Group'
(P2OG), to
launch secret operations aimed at "stimulating reactions" among
terrorists and
states possessing weapons of mass destruction -- that is, for instance,
prodding terrorist cells into action and exposing themselves to
'quick-response' attacks by U.S. forces." (William Arkin, The Secret
War, The
Los Angeles Times, 27 October 2002)
The P2OG initiative is nothing new. It essentially extends an existing
apparatus of covert operations. Amply documented, the CIA has supported
terrorist groups since the Cold War era. This "prodding of terrorist
cells"
under covert intelligence operations often requires the infiltration
and
training of the radical groups linked to Al Qaeda.
In this regard, covert support by the US military and intelligence
apparatus
has been channeled to various Islamic terrorist organizations through a
complex
network of intermediaries and intelligence proxies. (See below in
relation to
the Balkans)
Foreknowledge is a Red Herring
Foreknowledge implies and requires the existence of this "outside
enemy", who
is attacking America. Amply documented, the Islamic brigades and Al
Qaeda
including the madrassas and the CIA sponsored training camps in
Afghanistan are
a creation of the CIA. The Taliban were "graduates" of the madrassas,
which
formed a Us sponsored government in 1996.
During the Cold War, but also in its aftermath, the CIA using
Pakistan's
Military Intelligence apparatus as a go-between played a key role in
training
the Mujahideen. In turn, the CIA-sponsored guerrilla training was
integrated
with the teachings of Islam.
Every single US administration since Jimmy Carter has consistently
supported
the so-called "Militant Islamic Base", including Osama bin Laden's Al
Qaeda, as
part of their foreign policy agenda.
And in this regard, the Democrats and the Republicans have worked hand
in
glove. In fact, it is the US military and intelligence establishment
which has
provided continuity in US foreign policy.
Media Reports on Al Qaeda and Pakistan's Military Intelligence (ISI)
It is indeed revealing that in virtually all post 9/11 terrorist
occurrences,
the terrorist organization is reported (by the media and in official
statements) as having "ties to Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda". This in
itself is a
crucial piece of information. Of course, the fact that Al Qaeda is a
creation
of the CIA is neither mentioned in the press reports nor is it
considered
relevant to an understanding of these terrorist occurrences.
The ties of these terrorist organizations (particularly those in Asia)
to
Pakistan's military intelligence (ISI) is acknowledged in a few cases
by
official sources and press dispatches. Confirmed by the Council on
Foreign
Relations (CFR), some of these groups are said to have links to
Pakistan's ISI,
without identifying the nature of these links. Needless to say, this
information is crucial in identifying the sponsors of these terrorist
attacks.
In other words, the ISI is said to support these terrorist
organizations, while
at same time maintaining close ties to the CIA.
In other words, the focus on foreknowledge has served to usefully
distract
attention from the US government's longstanding relationship to the
terror
network since the Soviet-Afghan war, which inevitably raises the
broader issue
of treason and war crimes.
The foreknowledge issue in a sense erases the historical record because
it
denies a relationship between Al Qaeda and successive US
administrations.
The administration is accused of not acting upon these terrorist
warnings.
In the words of Richard Clarke:
"we must try to achieve a level of public discourse on these issues
that is
simultaneously energetic and mutually respectful... We all want to
defeat the
jihadists. [this is the consensus] To do that, we need to encourage an
active,
critical and analytical debate in America about how that will best be
done. And
if there is another major terrorist attack in this country, we must not
panic
or stifle debate as we did for too long after 9/11."(New York Times, 25
April
2004)
Bush and the White House intelligence team are said to have ignored
these
warnings. Richard Clarke who was in charge of counter terrorism on the
National
Security Council until February 2003 has "apologized" to the American
people
and the families of the victims. Had they acted in a responsible
fashion, had
they taken the intelligence briefings seriously, 3000 lives would have
been
saved on September 11, 2001. But bear in mind that Richard Clarke was
part of
an intelligence team which was at the time providing support to Al
Qaeda in the
Balkans. (See below)
This new anti-Bush consensus concerning the 9/11 attacks has engulfed
part of
the 9/11 truth movement. The outright lies in sworn testimony to the
9/11
Commission have been denounced in chorus; the families of the victims
have
expressed their indignation.
The debate centers on whether the administration is responsible for an
"intelligence failure" or whether it was the result of "incompetence."
In both cases, the al Qaeda legend remains unchallenged. The fact that
Al Qaeda
hijackers were responsible for 9/11 remains unchallenged.
Source of Terrorist Warnings
Beneath the rhetoric, nobody seems to have questioned the source of
these
warnings emanating from an intelligence apparatus, which is known to
have
supported Al Qaeda throughout the entire post cold War era.
In other words, are the terrorist warnings emanating out of the CIA a
"true"
representation of the terrorist threat or are they part of the process
of
disinformation which seeks precisely to uphold Al Qaeda as an "Enemy of
the
Homeland".
Meanwhile, the issues of "cover-up and complicity" at the highest
levels of the
Bush administration, which were raised in the immediate wake of the
9/11
attacks have been shoved out.
The role of Bush officials, their documented links to the terror
network, the
business ties between the Bushes and bin Laden families, the role of
Pakistan's
Military Intelligence (ISI) which supported and abetted Al Qaeda while
working
hand in glove with their US counterparts (CIA and the Defense
Intelligence
Agency), the fact that several Bush officials were the architects of Al
Qaeda
during the Reagan administration, as revealed by the Iran Contra
investigation.
See Michel Chossudovsky,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO303D.html
"The Saudis Did It"
All of this, which is carefully documented, is no longer relevant. It
is no
longer an issue for debate and investigation. What the media, as well
as some
of the key 9/11 investigators are pushing is that "The Saudis did it".
The
outside enemy Al Qaeda is said to be supported by supported by the
Saudis.
This line of analysis, which characterizes the 1 trillion dollar law
suit by
the families of the victims led by Lawyer Ted Motley, is evidently
flawed.
While it highlights the business ties between the Bushes and the bin
Ladens, in
does not challenge the legend of the outside enemy.
"The Saudis did it" is also part of the US foreign policy agenda, to be
eventually used to discredit the Saudi monarchy and destabilize the
Saudi
financiers, who oversee 25 percent of the World's oil reserves, ten
times those
of the US. in fact, this process has already begun with the Saudi
privatization
program, which seeks to transfer Saudi wealth and assets into foreign
(Anglo-American) hands.
The Saudi financiers were never prime movers. They were proxies. They
played a
subordinate role. They worked closely with US intelligence and their
American
financial counterparts. They were involved in the laundering of drug
money
working closely with the CIA. Thew Wahabbi sects from Saudi Arabia were
sent to
Afghanistan to set up the madrassas. The Saudis channeled covert
financing to
the various Islamic insurgencies on behalf of the CIA.
In other words, the "Saudis did It" consensus essentially contributes
to
whitewashing the Bush administration, while also providing pretext to
destabilize Saudi Arabia.
"The Bush Lied" Consensus upholds "The Big Lie"
This emerging 9/11 consensus ("Outside enemy", intelligence failures,
criminal
negligence, "the Saudis did it", etc.) which is making its way into
American
history books, is "they knew, but failed to act".
It was incompetence or criminal negligence but it was not treason. The
wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq were "just wars", they were undertaken in
accordance with
the National Security doctrine, which views Al Qaeda as the outside
enemy. It
is worth noting that at the outset of the war on Afghanistan, a number
of
prominent Western intellectuals, trade union and civil society leaders
supported the "Just War" concept.
While the Bush administration takes the blame, the "war on terrorism"
and its
humanitarian mandate remain functionally intact.
Meanwhile, everybody has their eyes riveted on the fact that Bush
officials
lied under oath regarding the terrorist warnings.
Yet nobody seems to have begged the key question:
What is the significance of these warnings emanating from the
intelligence
apparatus, knowing that the CIA is the creator of Al Qaeda and that Al
Qaeda is
an "intelligence asset".
In other words, the CIA is the sponsor of Al Qaeda and at the same time
controls the warnings on impending terrorist attacks.
In other words, are Bush officials in sworn testimony to the 9/11
commission
lying under oath on something which is true, or are they lying on
something
which is an even bigger lie?
The Legend of the "Outside Enemy"
The 1993 WTC bombing was heralded by the Bush Administration as one of
the
earlier Al Qaeda attacks on the Homeland. Since 9/11, the 1993 WTC
bombing has
become part of "the 9/11 legend" which describes Al Qaeda as "an
outside
enemy."
In the words of National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice (April 2004)
in
sworn testimony at the 9/11 Commission:
"The terrorist threat to our Nation did not emerge on September 11th,
2001.
Long before that day, radical, freedom-hating terrorists declared war
on
America and on the civilized world. The attack on the Marine barracks
in
Lebanon in 1983, the hijacking of the Achille Lauro in 1985, the rise
of
al-Qaida and the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, the attacks
on
American installations in Saudi Arabia in 1995 and 1996, the East
Africa
embassy bombings of 1998, the attack on the USS Cole in 2000, these and
other
atrocities were part of a sustained, systematic campaign to spread
devastation
and chaos and to murder innocent Americans." (See complete transcript
of her
testimony at (http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC404A.html )
Below we provide evidence of US-Al Qaeda collaboration from official
sources
which confirms unequivocally that Al Qaeda was a US sponsored
"intelligence
asset" during the entire post Cold War era.
POST COLD WAR ERA: Time Line of Al Qaeda- US Collaboration
1993-1994
BOSNIAGATE Clinton Administration collaborates with Al Qaeda
(1993-1994)
At the time of the 1993 WTC bombing, the Clinton Administration and al
Qaeda
were actively collaborating in joint military operations in Bosnia, as
confirmed by an official congressional report emanating from the
Republican
Party.
The Clinton Administration's "hands-on" involvement with the Islamic
network's
arms pipeline included inspections of missiles from Iran by U.S.
government
officials.
The Militant Islamic Network (page 5): Along with the weapons, Iranian
Revolutionary Guards and VEVAK intelligence operatives entered Bosnia
in large
numbers, along with thousands of mujahedin ("holy warriors") from
across the
Muslim world. Also engaged in the effort were several other Muslim
countries
(including Brunei, Malaysia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Turkey)
and a
number of radical Muslim organizations. For example, the role of one
Sudan-based "humanitarian organization," called the Third World Relief
Agency,
has been well documented. The Clinton Administration's "hands-on"
involvement
with the Islamic network's arms pipeline included inspections of
missiles from
Iran by U.S. government officials.
In short, the Clinton Administration's policy of facilitating the
delivery of
arms to the Bosnian Muslims made it the de facto partner of an ongoing
international network of governments and organizations pursuing their
own
agenda in Bosnia...For example, one such group about which details have
come to
light is the Third World Relief Agency (TWRA), a Sudan-based, phoney
humanitarian organization which has been a major link in the arms
pipeline to
Bosnia. ["How Bosnia's Muslims Dodged Arms Embargo: Relief Agency
Brokered Aid
From Nations, Radical Groups," Washington Post, 9/22/96; see also
"Saudis
Funded Weapons For Bosnia, Official Says: $ 300 Million Program Had
U.S.
'Stealth Cooperation'," Washington Post, 2/2/96] TWA is believed to be
connected with such fixtures of the Islamic terror network as Sheik
Omar Abdel
Rahman (the convicted mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center
bombing)
and Osama Binladen, a wealthy Saudi emigre believed to bankroll
numerous
militant groups. [WP, 9/22/96]
Clinton Administration supported the "Militant Islamic Base", Senate
Press
Release, US Congress, 16 January 1997,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/DCH109A.html
original Senate Document
http://www.senate.gov/~rpc/releases/1997/iran.htm
The alleged terrorist Sheik Omar Abdul Rahman was sentenced as the
mastermind
behind the 1993 WTC bombings and subsequently convicted to life
imprisonment.
From the Horse's Mouth
In a bitter irony, the same individual Omar Abdul Rahman was identified
in the
1997 Report of the Republican Party Policy Committee of the US Senate
(see
above) as collaborating with Clinton officials in bringing in weapons
and
Mujahideen into Bosnia. In other words, the Republican party confirms
that Omar
Abdul Rahman and Al Qaeda were US sponsored "intelligence assets".
When Bill Clinton, appeared before the 9/11 Commission (April 2004),
was he
questioned on his links to the terror network, including the mastermind
of the
1993 WTC bombing? No!
What can conclude: A Clinton-Osama-Abdel Rahman Triangle. The
Foreknowledge
issue falls flat on its face. What we are dealing with is "Treason" and
Cover-up" on the history of the Clinton Administration's links to the
alleged
"Outside Enemy". Treason is defined as: "consciously and purposely
acting to
aid its enemies."
1995-1999. NATO AND THE US MILITARY COLLABORATED WITH AL QAEDA IN
KOSOVO
(1995-1999)
We provide below several statements from Congressional records which
point to
US support to the terror network in Kosovo (1995-1999) and which amply
refute
the existence of an "Outside Enemy"
Frank Ciluffo of the Globalized Organized Crime Program in a testimony
presented to the House of Representatives Judicial Committee:
What was largely hidden from public view was the fact that the KLA
raise part
of their funds from the sale of narcotics. Albania and Kosovo lie at
the heart
of the Balkan Route that links the "Golden Crescent" of Afghanistan and
Pakistan to the drug markets of Europe. This route is worth an
estimated $400
billion a year and handles 80 per cent of heroin destined for Europe.
(U.S.
Congress, Testimony of Frank J. Cilluffo, Deputy Director of the Global
Organized Crime Program, to the House Judiciary Committee, Washington
DC, 13
December 2000)
Ralf Mutschke of Interpol's Criminal Intelligence division, also in a
testimony
to the House Judicial Committee:
The U.S. State Department listed the KLA as a terrorist organization,
indicating that it was financing its operations with money from the
international heroin trade and loans from Islamic countries and
individuals,
among them allegedly Osama bin Laden. Another link to bin Laden is the
fact
that the brother of a leader in an Egyptian Jihad organization and also
a
military commander of Osama bin Laden, was leading an elite KLA unit
during the
Kosovo conflict.
(U.S. Congress, House Judicial Committee, Washington DC, 13 December
2000)
Rep. John Kasich of the House Armed Services Committee:
"We connected ourselves [in 1998-99] with the KLA, which was the
staging point
for bin Laden." (U.S. Congress, Transcripts of the House Armed Services
Committee, Washington, DC, 5 October 1999)
In 1999, Senator Jo Lieberman stated authoritatively that
"Fighting for the KLA is fighting for human rights and American
values."
In making this statement he knew that the KLA was supported by Osama
bin Laden.
What can we conclude from these and other statements? The transcripts
from
Congressional documents refute the existence of the "outside enemy".
Al Qaeda (our "intelligence asset") supported and continues to support
the KLA.
The Clinton administration supported the KLA. Secretary of State
Madeleine
Albright coveted KLA leaders Hashim Thaci.
Military Professional Resources (MPRI), a mercenary company on contract
to the
Pentagon was involved in the training the KLA. The KLA was also
trained by US
and British Special Forces. But the KLA was also trained by Al Qaeda.
The US
collaborated in training a terrorist organization which has with links
to al
Qaeda, the drug trade and organized crime.
The Bush Administration has followed in the footsteps of the Clinton
administration. The KLA is supported by the US military, while also
being
backed by Al Qaeda.
2000-2001: 8/01: THE ISLAMIC MILITANT NETWORK, NATO AND THE US
MILITARY JOIN
HANDS IN MACEDONIA
Barely a few weeks before 9/11, in August 2001, senior U.S. military
advisers
from a private mercenary outfit on contract to the Pentagon (MPRI),
were
advising the self-proclaimed National Liberation Army (NLA) of
Macedonia.
Mujahideen detached by Al Qaeda from the Middle East and Central Asia
were
fighting in a paramilitary army, which was also supported by the US
military
and NATO.
The NLA is a proxy of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). In turn, the
KLA and
the UN-sponsored Kosovo Protection Corps (KPC) are identical
institutions with
the same commanders and military personnel. KPC Commanders on UN
salaries are
fighting in the NLA together with the Mujahideen.
Ironically, while supported and financed by Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda,
the
KLA-NLA is also supported by NATO and the United Nations mission to
Kosovo
(UNMIK). In fact, the Islamic Militant Network also using Pakistan's
Inter
Service Intelligence (ISI) as the CIA's go-between still constitutes an
integral part of Washington=s covert military-intelligence operations
in
Macedonia and Southern Serbia.
The KLA-NLA terrorists are funded from U.S. military aid, the United
Nations
peace-keeping budget, as well as by several Islamic organizations
including
Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda. Drug money is also being used to finance
the
terrorists with the complicity of the U.S. government. The recruitment
of
Mujahideen to fight in the ranks of the NLA in Macedonia is implemented
through
various Islamic groups.
U.S. military advisers mingle with the Mujahideen within the same
paramilitary
force; Western mercenaries from NATO countries fight alongside the
Mujahideen
recruited in the Middle East and Central Asia. And the U.S. media calls
this a
>blowback= where so-called "intelligence assets" have gone against
their
sponsors!
But this did not happen during the Cold War! It happened in Macedonia
in the
months leading up to 9/11. And it is confirmed by numerous press
reports,
eyewitness accounts, photographic evidence as well as official
statements by
the Macedonian Prime Minister, who has accused the Western military
alliance of
supporting the terrorists. Moreover, the official Macedonian News
Agency (MIA)
has pointed to the complicity between Washington's envoy Ambassador
James
Pardew and the NLA terrorists. In other words, the so-called
"intelligence
assets" were still serving the interests of their U.S. sponsors.
8/06 THE AUGUST 6, 2001 THE PRESIDENTIAL INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING (PDB)
The August 6 2001 intelligence briefing (PDB) prepared for President
George W.
Bush was entitled "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US".
PDBs are prepared at CIA headquarters at Langley and are presented to
President
Bush on a daily basis in the form of an oral briefing by CIA Director
George
Tenet. Below are selected excerpts from the PDB. The complete text of
the
August 6, 2001
PDB can be consulted at
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/WHI404A.html
The presumption in media reports is that this August 6 PDB is based on
an
actual terror threat. In fact, what the PTB does is to fabricate a
terror
threat. Below are few selected excerpts.
"Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate Bin Ladin
since
1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the US."
[This statement is disinformation. During that period the US was
collaborating
with Al Qaeda in the Balkans, see above]
"We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational
threat
reporting, such as that from a ... (redacted portion) ... service in
1998
saying that Bin Ladin wanted to hijack a US aircraft to gain the
release of
“Blind Shaykh” ’Umar ’Abd al-Rahman and other US-held extremists.
Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of
suspicious
activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or
other
types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in
New
York.
[Does the CIA Director inform the president that a proxy organization
of Sheik
Abdu Rahman was actually collaborating with US military inspectors in
Bosnia as
confirmed by the 1997 Republican Party Committee report.]
The FBI is conducting approximately 70 full field investigations
throughout the
US that it considers Bin Ladin-related. CIA and the FBI are
investigating a
call to our Embassy in the UAE in May saying that a group of Bin Ladin
supporters was in the US planning attacks with explosives.
[Does the CIA Director advise the president that Osama bin Laden was in
the UAE
in July of that year receiving treatment for a kidney condition at the
American
Hospital in Dubai and that the American hospital has close links to the
US
embassy (See the report published in Le Figaro,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC111B.html )]
8/27-8/30 2001 AUGUST 27-30: MISSION TO ISLAMABAD AND RAWALPINDI FOR
INTELLIGENCE CONSULTATIONS
From the 27th to the 30th of August 2001, barely a couple of weeks
before 9/11,
the chairmen of the Senate and House intelligence committees,
respectively
Senator Bob Graham and Representative Porter Goss together with Senator
Jon
Kyl, were in Islamabad for "consultations". Meetings were held with
President
Musharraf and with Pakistan's military and intelligence brass including
the
head of Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) General Mahmoud
Ahmad.
See http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO111A.html
An AFP report confirms that the US Congressional delegation also met
the Afghan
ambassador to Pakistan, Abdul Salam Zaeef. At this meeting, which was
barely
mentioned by the US media, "Zaeef assured the US delegation [on behalf
of the
Afghan government] that the Taliban would never allow bin Laden to use
Afghanistan to launch attacks on the US or any other country." (Agence
France
Presse (AFP), 28 August 2001.)
The September FBI Report
An FBI report released to ABC news in late September 2001, which was
subsequently confirmed by a Times of India report, suggests that
Pakistan's
Military Intelligence (ISI), headed by General Mahmoud Ahmad, played a
key role
in transferring money to the 9/11 hijackers.
General Mahmoud Ahmad had allegedly ordered the transfer of $100.000 to
the
alleged 9/11 ring-leader Mohamed Atta. (See Michel Chossudovsky, War
and
Globalization, The Truth behind 9/11,
http://globalresearch.ca/globaloutlook/truth911.html )
As to September 11th, federal authorities have told ABC News they have
now
tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan, to two banks in
Florida, to
accounts held by suspected hijack ring leader Mohammed Atta. As well,
this
morning, Time magazine is reporting that some of that money came in the
days
just before the attack and can be traced directly to people connected
to Osama
bin Laden. It's all part of what has been a successful FBI effort so
far to
close in on the hijacker=s high commander, the money men, the planners
and the
mastermind.21
Note the sequencing of these meetings. Bob Graham and Porter Goss were
in
Islamabad in late August 2001, meeting General Mahmoud Ahmad, the
alleged
"money man" behind 9/11. The meetings with President Musharraf and the
Afghan
Ambassador were on the 27th of August, the mission was still in
Islamabad on
the 30th of August.
9/ 4- 9/13: HEAD OF PAKISTAN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE (ISI) ARRIVES IN
WASHINGTON
ON SEPTEMBER 4, DEPARTS ON SEPTEMBER 13
General Mahmoud Ahmad arrived in Washington on an official visit of
consultations barely a few days later (September 4th). During his visit
to
Washington he met his counterpart CIA director George Tenet and high
ranking
officials of the Bush administration including Richard Armitage and
Colin
Powell. At the US congress, the General meets up with Senator Joseph
Biden,
Chairman of Foreign Relations Committee (13 Sept), Senator Bob Graham
and
Representative Porter Goss. Graham and Goss, the men who hosted the
general
will alter be called upon to set up the Joint Senate-House Inquiry on
9/11.
9/9: THE ASSASSINATION OF THE LEADER OF THE NORTHERN ALLIANCE AHMAD
SHAH
MASSOOD
The leader of the Northern Alliance Commander Ahmad Shah Masood was
mortally
wounded in a kamikaze assassination on September 9, 2001. It happened
two days
before the 9/11 attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon. Masood later died
from
wounds suffered in the suicide attack on the Saturday (9/15) following
9/11.
In the wake of the September 11 attacks, the killing of Ahmad Shah
Masood was
barely mentioned. The broad media consensus was that the two events
(9/9 and
9/11) were totally unrelated. Yet the Northern Alliance had informed
the Bush
administration through an official communiqué that Pakistan's ISI was
allegedly
implicated in the assassination:
"A Pakistani ISI-Osama-Taliban axis [was responsible for] plotting the
assassination by two Arab suicide bombers.. 'We believe that this is a
triangle
between Osama bin Laden, ISI, which is the intelligence section of the
Pakistani army, and the Taliban'" (The Northern Alliance's statement
was
released on 14 September 2001, quoted in Reuters, 15 September 2001)
'Pakistan's ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence), the Taliban and Osama
bin Laden
appear to be behind this plot.'" (AFP, 10 September 2001)
In other words, there is reason to believe that the 9/9 and 9/11 are
not
isolated and unrelated events.
According to official statements and reports, the ISI was allegedly
implicated
in both events: the September 9, 2001 assassination of Shah Masood and
the
financing of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Both these events directly
implicate senior officials in the Bush administration.
While the US media tacitly acknowledges the role of Pakistan's ISI in
the
assassination of Shah Masood, it fails to dwell upon the more
substantive
issue: How come the head of the ISI was in Washington, on an official
visit,
meeting Bush administration officials on the very same day Masood was
assassinated?
Had Masood not been assassinated, the Bush administration would not
have been
able to install their political puppet Hamid Karzai in Kaboul.
Masood rather rather than Hamid Karzai (a former employee of UNOCAL oil
company), would have become the head of the post-Taliban government
formed in
the wake of the U.S. bombings of Afghanistan.
9/10 OSAMA IN HOSPITAL ON 9/10, ONE DAY BEFORE THE ATTACKS ON THE WTC
Don Rumsfeld states that the whereabouts of Osama are unknown. Yet,
according
to Dan Rather, CBS, Bin Laden was back in Hospital, one day before the
9/11
attacks, on September 10, this time, courtesy of America's indefectible
ally
Pakistan. Pakistan's Military Intelligence (ISI) told CBS that bin
Laden had
received dialysis treatment in Rawalpindi, at Pak Army's headquarters:
transcript of CBS report,
see
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CBS203A.html ,
see also
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/28/eveningnews/main325887.shtml
It should be noted, that the hospital is directly under the
jurisdiction of the
Pakistani Armed Forces, which has close links to the Pentagon. U.S.
military
advisers based in Rawalpindi. work closely with the Pakistani Armed
Forces.
Again, no attempt was made to arrest America's best known fugitive, but
then
maybe bin Laden was serving another "better purpose". Rumsfeld claimed
at the
time that he had no knowledge regarding Osama's health.
(see CBS
transcript
above).
Needless to say, the CBS report is a crucial piece of information in
the 9/11
jigsaw. It refutes the administration's claim that the whereabouts of
bin Laden
are unknown. It points to a Pakistan connection, it suggests a cover-up
at the
highest levels of the Bush administration.
Dan Rather and Barry Petersen fail to draw the implications of their
January
2002 report. They fail to beg the question: where was Osama on 9/11?
If they
are to stand by their report, the conclusion is obvious: The
administration is
lying regarding the whereabouts of Osama.
If the CBS report is accurate and Osama had indeed been admitted to the
Pakistani military hospital on September 10, courtesy of America's
ally, he
could still be in hospital in Rawalpindi on the 11th of September, when
the
attacks occurred.
In all probability, his whereabouts were known to US officials on the
morning
of September 12, when Secretary of State Colin Powell initiated
negotiations
with Pakistan, with a view to arresting and extraditing bin Laden.
These negotiations, led by General Mahmoud Ahmad, head of Pakistan's
military
intelligence, on behalf of the government of President Pervez
Musharraf, took
place on the 12th and 13th of September in Deputy Secretary of State
Richard
Armitage's office. The general also met Colin Powell in discussions at
the
State Department on the 13th.
9/11. THE FOLLOW-UP BREAKFAST MEETING ON CAPITOL HILL WITH GENERAL
MAHMOUD
AHMAD
On the morning of September 11, the three lawmakers Bob Graham, Porter
Goss and
Jon Kyl (who were part of the Congressional delegation to Pakistan)
were having
breakfast on Capitol Hill with General Ahmad, the alleged "money-man"
behind
the 9-11 hijackers. Also present at this meeting were Pakistan's
ambassador to
the U.S. Maleeha Lodhi and several members of the Senate and House
Intelligence
committees were also present. This meeting was described by one press
report as
a "follow-up meeting" to that held in Pakistan in late August. (see
above) "On
8/30, Senate Intelligence Committee chair Sen. Bob Graham (D-FL) 'was
on a
mission to learn more about terrorism.' (…) On 9/11, Graham was back in
DC 'in
a follow-up meeting with' Pakistan intelligence agency chief Mahmud
Ahmed and
House Intelligence Committee chair Porter Goss (R-FL)" 3 (The Hotline,
1
October 2002):
While trivializing the importance of the 9/11 breakfast meeting, The
Miami
Herald (16 September 2001) confirms that General Ahmad also met
Secretary of
State Colin Powell in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.
Again the political significance of the personal relationship between
General
Mahmoud (the alleged "money man" behind 9/11) and Secretary of State
Colin
Powell is casually dismissed. According to The Miami Herald, the high
level
meeting between the two men was not planned in advance. It took place
on the
spur of the moment because of the shut down of air traffic, which
prevented
General Mahmoud from flying back home to Islamabad on a commercial
flight, when
in all probability the General and his delegation were traveling on a
chartered
government plane. With the exception of the Florida press (and
Salon.com, 14
September), not a word was mentioned in the US media's September
coverage of
9-11 concerning this mysterious breakfast reunion.
Eight months later on the 18th of May, two days after the "BUSH KNEW"
headline
hit the tabloids, the Washington Post published an article on Porter
Goss,
entitled: "A Cloak But No Dagger; An Ex-Spy Says He Seeks Solutions,
Not
Scapegoats for 9/11". Focusing on his career as a CIA agent, the
article
largely served to underscore the integrity and commitment of Porter
Goss to
waging a "war on terrorism". Yet in an isolated paragraph, the article
acknowledges the mysterious 9/11 breakfast meeting with ISI Chief
Mahmoud
Ahmad, while also confirming that "Ahmad :ran a spy agency notoriously
close to
Osama bin Laden and the Taliban":
While the Washington Post scores in on the "notoriously close" links
between
General Ahmad and Osama bin Laden, it fails to dwell on the more
important
question: what were Rep. Porter Goss and Senator Bob Graham and other
members
of the Senate and House intelligence committees doing together with the
alleged
9/11 "money-man" at breakfast on the morning of 9/11. In other words,
the
Washington Post report does not go one inch further in begging the real
question: Was this mysterious breakfast venue a "political lapse", an
intelligence failure or something far more serious? How come the very
same
individuals (Goss and Graham) who had developed a personal rapport with
General
Ahmad, had been entrusted under the joint committee inquiry "to reveal
the
truth on 9-11."
The media trivialises the breakfast meeting, it presents it as a simple
fait
divers and fails to "put two and two together". Neither does it
acknowledge the
fact, amply documented, that "the money-man" behind the hijackers had
been
entrusted by the Pakistani government to discuss the precise terms of
Pakistan's "collaboration" in the "war on terrorism" in meetings held
behind
closed doors at the State department on the 12th and 13th of September.
9/12-9/13 THE AFTERMATH, THE ALLEGED MONEYMAN MEETS COLIN POWELL AND
RICHARD
ARMITAGE
Bear in mind that the purpose of his meeting at the State Department on
the
13th was only made public after the September 11 terrorist attacks when
the
Bush administration took the decision to formally seek the cooperation
of
Pakistan in its "campaign against international terrorism." despite the
links
of Pakistan's ISI to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban and its alleged
role in
the assassination of Commander Massoud. 2 days before 9/11.
Meanwhile, the Western media in the face of mounting evidence had
remained
silent on the insidious role of Pakistan's Military Intelligence agency
(ISI).
The assassination of Massoud was mentioned, but its political
significance in
relation to September 11 and the subsequent decision to go to war
against
Afghanistan was barely touched upon. Without discussion or debate,
Pakistan was
heralded as a friend and an ally of America. In an utterly twisted
logic, the
U.S. media concluded in chorus that:
U.S. officials had sought cooperation from Pakistan [precisely] because
it is
the original backer of the Taliban, the hard-line Islamic leadership of
Afghanistan accused by Washington of harboring bin Laden. 9
The Bush Administration had not only provided red carpet treatment to
the
alleged "money man" behind the 9-11 attacks, it also had sought his
‘cooperation' in the "war on terrorism". The precise terms of this
‘cooperation' were agreed upon between General Mahmoud Ahmad,
representing the
Pakistani government and Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, in
meetings at the State Department on September 12 and 13. In other
words, the
Administration decided in the immediate wake of 9-11, to seek the
‘cooperation'
of Pakistan's ISI in "going after Osama", despite the fact (documented
by the
FBI) that the ISI was financing and abetting the 9-11 terrorists.
Contradictory? One might say that it's like "asking Al Capone to help
in going
after organized crime"
------------------------------------------------------------
9/11 Timeline
1. AL QAEDA IS BORN, THE COLD WAR ERA
1979, LARGEST COVERT OPERATION IN THE HISTORY OF THE CIA LAUNCHED IN
AFGHANISTAN, CREATING THE ISLAMIC BRIGADES TO FIGHT IN THE SOVIET
AFGHAN-WAR.
AL QAEDA IS BORN
1985, PRESIDENT REAGAN SIGNED NATIONAL SECURITY DECISION DIRECTIVE 166
AUTHORIZING STEPPED UP COVERT MILITARY AID TO THE MUJAHIDEEN
1989- END OF THE SOVIET-AFGHAN WAR, END OF THE COLD WAR, STEPPED UP
COVERT
OPERATIONS IN THE (FORMER) SOVIET UNION AND THE BALKANS
1996 THE TALIBAN FORM A GOVERNMENT WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE US
------------------------------------------------------------
2. POST COLD WAR SUPPORT TO AL QAEDA IN THE BALKANS
1991 BEGINNING OF CIVIL WAR IN YUGOSLAVIA
1993-1994 CLINTON ADMINISTRATION COLLABORATES WITH AL QAEDA IN BOSNIA
1995-1999. NATO AND THE US MILITARY COLLABORATE WITH AL QAEDA IN KOSOVO
2000-2001. THE ISLAMIC MILITANT NETWORK, NATO, THE US MILITARY AND THE
UNITED
NATIONS MISSION IN KOSOVO JOIN HANDS IN MACEDONIA IN SUPPORTING THE NLA
------------------------------------------------------------
SHORT TIMELINE (JULY- SEPTEMBER 2001
7/01 JULY 2001: OSAMA BIN LADEN IN THE AMERICAN HOSPITAL IN DUBAI, UAE
8/06 THE AUGUST 6, 2001 THE PRESIDENTIAL INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING (PDB)
8/27-8/30 2001 AUGUST 27-30 MISSION OF SENATOR BOB GRAHAM AND REP
PORTER GOSS
TO ISLAMABAD AND RAWALPINDI FOR INTELLIGENCE CONSULTATIONS WITH
PRESIDENT
MUSHARRAF AND ISI CHIEF GENERAL MAHMOUD AHMAD
9/ 4- 9/13: HEAD OF PAKISTAN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE (ISI) ARRIVES IN
WASHINGTON
ON AN OFFICIAL VISIT. ARRIVES ON SEPTEMBER 4, DEPARTS ON SEPTEMBER 13
9/9: THE ASSASSINATION OF THE LEADER OF THE NORTHERN ALLIANCE AHMAD
SHAH
MASSOOD
9/10 OSAMA IN HOSPITAL ON 9/10, ONE DAY BEFORE THE ATTACKS ON THE WTC
9/11. 11 SEPTEMBER: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON WTC AND PENTAGON. FOLLOW-UP
BREAKFAST
MEETING ON CAPITOL HILL WITH GENERAL MAHMOUD AHMAD HOSTED BY SENATOR
BOB GRAHAM
AND REP PORTER GOSS. THE "WAR ON TERRORISM" IS OFFICIALLY LAUNCHED
9/12-9/13 THE AFTERMATH, THE ALLEGED "MONEYMAN" GENERAL MAHMOUD AHMAD
MEETS
COLIN POWELL & RICHARD ARMITAGE AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT TO DISUCSS
TERMS OF
PAKISTAN’S COOPERATION IN THE WAR ON TERRORISM .
Who in the Bush Administration has Links to Al Qaeda?
The Bush administration accuses people of having links to al Qaeda.
This is the
doctrine behind the anti-terrorist legislation and homeland Security.
This relationship of the Bush Administration to international
terrorism, which
is a matter of public record, indelibly points to the criminalization
of the
upper echelons of US State apparatus.
Colin Powell's Role: From Iran-Contra to September 11
Both Colin Powell and his Deputy Richard Armitage, who casually accused
Baghdad
and other foreign governments of "harboring" Al Qaeda, played a direct
role, at
different points in their careers, in supporting terrorist
organizations.
Both men were implicated --operating behind the scenes-- in the
Irangate Contra
scandal during the Reagan Administration, which involved the illegal
sale of
weapons to Iran to finance the Nicaraguan Contra paramilitary army.
[Coronel Oliver] North set up a team including [Richard] Secord; Noel
Koch
[Armitage's deputy] , then assistant secretary at the Pentagon
responsible for
special operations; George Cave, a former CIA station chief in Tehran,
and
Colin Powell, military assistant to U.S. Defense Secretary Caspar
Weinberger...(The Guardian, December 10, 1986)
Although Colin Powell was not directly involved in the arms' transfer
negotiations, which had been entrusted to Oliver North, he was among
"at least
five men within the Pentagon who knew arms were being transferred to
the CIA."
(The Record, 29 December 1986). Lieutenant General Powell was directly
instrumental in giving the "green light" to lower-level Irangate
officials in
blatant violation of Congressional procedures. According to the New
York Times,
Colin Powell took the decision (at the level of military procurement),
to allow
the delivery of weapons to Iran:
Hurriedly, one of the men closest to Secretary of Defense Weinberger,
Maj. Gen.
Colin Powell, bypassed the written ''focal point system'' procedures
and
ordered the Defense Logistics Agency [responsible for procurement] to
turn over
the first of 2,008 TOW missiles to the C.I.A., which acted as cutout
for
delivery to Iran" (New York Times, 16 February 1987)
Richard Armitage
Richard Armitage held the position of Assistant Secretary of Defense in
the
Reagan Administration. He was in charge of coordinating covert military
operations including the Iran-Contra operation. He was in close liaison
with
Coronel Oliver North. His deputy and chief anti-terrorist official
.Noel Koch
was part of the team set up by Oliver North. Following the delivery of
the TOW
anti-tank missiles to Iran, the proceeds of these sales were deposited
in
numbered bank accounts and the money was used to finance the Nicaraguan
Contras. (UPI. 27 November 1987). A classified Israeli report provided
to the
Iran- contra panels of the Congressional enquiry confirms that Armitage
''was
in the picture on the Iranian issue.'' (New York Times, 26 May 1989):
"With a Pentagon position that placed him over the military's covert
operations
branch, Armitage was a party to the secret arms dealing from the
outset. He
also was associated with former national security aide Oliver L. North
in a
White House counterterrorism group, another area that would also have
been a
likely focus of congressional inquiry" (Washington Post, 26 May 1989)
CIA Director William Casey with the collaboration of Richard Armitage
in the
Pentagon "ran the Mujahideen covert war against the Soviet Union…"
(quoted in
Domestic Terrorism: The Big Lie The "War") "Contragate was also an
off-the-shelf drug-financed operation run by Casey." (Ibid ).
Financing the Islamic Brigades
The Iran Contra procedure was similar to that used in Afghanistan,
where secret
aid was channeled to the militant Islamic brigade (US News and World
Report, 15
December 1986). In fact part of the proceeds of the weapons sales to
Iran had
been channeled to finance the Mujahideen. :
":The Washington Post reported that profits from the Iran arms sales
were
deposited in one CIA-managed account into which the U.S. and Saudi
Arabia had
placed $250 million apiece. That money was disbursed not only to the
contras in
Central America but to the rebels fighting Soviet troops in
Afghanistan."(U.S.
News & World Report, 15 December 1986)
The Irangate Cover-up
Reagan's National Security Adviser Rear Admiral John Pointdexter, who
was later
indicted on conspiracy charges and lying to Congress was replaced by
Frank
Carlucci as National Security Adviser. And Maj. General Colin Powell
was
appointed deputy to Frank Carlucci, namely "'number two" on the
National
Security team.
"Both came to the White House after the Iran contra revelations and the
NSC
housecleaning [i.e. coverup] that followed [the Irangate scandal]" (The
MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour, 16 June 1987).
Needless to say, this housecleaning was a cover-up: Colin Powell was in
on the
Irangate affair
While several Irangate officials including John Pointdexter and Oliver
North
were accused of criminal wrongdoing, the main actors in the CIA and the
Pentagon, namely Armitage and Casey, were never indicted, neither was
Lieutenant General Colin Powell who authorized the procurement of TOW
missiles
from the Defense Logistics Agency .
Moreover, while weapons were being sold covertly to Iran, Washington
was also
supplying weapons through official channels to Baghdad. In other words,
Washington was arming both sides in the Iran-Iraq war. And who was in
charge of
negotiating those weapons sales to Baghdad? Donald Rumsfeld
How to Reverse the Tide
September 11 has been used profusely by the Bush administration as a
justification for waging a preemptive war without borders.
It is part of the Administration’s doctrine of "self-defense". But that
justification is based on a lie: that America is under attack by an
outside
enemy.
The so-called "War on Terrorism" is a lie.
Realities have been turned upside down.
Acts of war are heralded as "humanitarian interventions" geared towards
restoring democracy.
Military occupation and the killing of civilians are presented as
"peace-keeping operations."
The derogation of civil liberties by imposing the so-called
anti-terrorist
legislation is portrayed as a means to providing domestic security and
upholding civil liberties.
This system relies on the manipulation of public opinion.
The fabricated realities of the Bush administration must become
indelible
truths, which form part of a broad political and media consensus. In
this
regard, the corporate media is an instrument of a de facto police
state, which
has carefully excluded, from the outset, any real understanding of the
September 11 crisis.
Millions of people have been misled regarding the causes and
consequences of
September 11.
When people across the US and around the World find out that Al Qaeda
is not an
outside enemy but a creation of US foreign policy and the CIA, the
legitimacy
of the Bush Administration will tumble like a deck of cards.
In other words, when the lies emanating from the seat of political
authority
are fully revealed, the perceived enemy will no longer be Al Qaeda but
Bush,
Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Powell, et al.
Bear in mind that the Democrats are also complicit. Democratic
administrations
have also supported Al Qaeda.
This relationship of successive US Administrations to international
terrorism,
which is a matter of public record, indelibly points to the
criminalization of
the upper echelons of US State apparatus.
Let's use this information to dismantle the Bush Administration's war
plans.
Sensitize our fellow citizens. Expose the "dubious links."
Because when the truth trickles down, the leaders' war and homeland
security
plans will not have a shred of legitimacy in the eyes of millions of
Americans
who believe that Al Qaeda is "A Threat to America" and that their
president is
committed to their security.
At this crucial juncture in our history, we must understand that
antiwar
sentiment in itself does not undermine the war agenda.
The only way to reverse the tide is to unseat the rulers, who are war
criminals.
And the way to unseat the rulers is to break their legitimacy in the
eyes of
the people.
In other words, it is necessary to fully reveal the lies concerning the
so-called "war on terrorism" to our fellow citizens, which were used to
justify
the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and impose the police State in the
US
A precondition for breaking the legitimacy of the Bush Administration
is to
fully reveal its links to international terrorism and its complicity in
the
tragic event of 9/11.
This objective can only be achieved by effectively curbing its
propaganda
campaign and spreading the truth through a grassroots citizen's
information
campaign.
*************************************
World Trade Center 7's (WTC-7) demise on September 11
*************************************
Mysteries abound about World Trade Center 7's (WTC-7) demise on
September 11.
In the early evening in the Big Apple of that horrific day this
47-story steel
building suddenly collapsed. An odd series of failures had occurred.
They began when a small amount of debris falls from the implosion of
World
Trade Center 1, a block away. Somehow small fires subsequently break
out in
WTC-7. The fireproofing systems completely fail. The fires burn all day
from an
unknown fuel. Eventually, the flames reach tanks of diesel fuel at
ground
level. Suddenly, the penthouse begins to fall. The entire lower levels
immediately experience the same massive failures. About seven seconds
later the
entire building is gone. It takes a minute for 2 million square feet of
office
space to become a large pile of rubble.
Satellite photos later confirm that the vast majority of WTC-7's rubble
rests
in what was the building’s footprint. The neatness of the rubble
enables
clean-up crews to swiftly remove and recycle the steel after just a
cursory
examination
See Eric Hufschmid at
http://www.erichufschmid.net/PainfulQuestions_1.pdf
World Trade Center 7 (WTC-7) was built in 1985. It was located across
Vesey
Street from the main World Trade Center compound. It was a
largely-conventional
steel building which had forty-four floors. Somewhat dark and sleek, it
was
designed by Emery Roth & Sons. It collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September
11, 2001.
Fortunately, WTC-7 had been evacuated and no one is known to have been
killed
by its demise.
It fell about seven hours after the strange collapses of the North and
South
Twin Towers. (WTC-2, the South tower, collapsed around 10:00 a.m.
WTC-1, the
North, came down about a half hour later.) The unknown quantity of
debris from
WTC-1 is said to have caused fires in WTC-7 that prevailed on the 11th
floor.
Sherlock Holmes once remarks how odd it is that a guard dog did not
bark at a
midnight intruder. Similarly, it is curious how few people bothered to
photograph a building about to totally collapse when destruction of an
inconceivable scale had been released just hours before (only 200'
away).
Apparently, the WTC-7 fires were not photogenic. Indeed, when viewing
the
extant documentation there are only small fires that are localized
within the
offices of the Securites Exchange Commission (SEC). Ironically, never
before
9/11/01 in history has a steel building even partially collapsed from a
fire.
Neither has any since.
According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“World Trade
Center
Building Performance Study”, document number 403, May, 2002) , 36,000
gallons
of diesel fuel was stored in diesel tanks just above and at ground
level. The
fuel, stored in fire-resistant containers, was there to run backup
generators.
However, the report never says for sure whether any burned. It also
fails to
confirm that burning diesel was the source of the building’s collapse.
The
report even ignores the biggest mystery of all. How this building could
have
fallen in its own footprint rather unlike what is expected from the
Leaning
Tower of Pisa is not discussed.
FEMA’s report is filled with rampant speculation and hypothetical
scenarios.
Throughout it are weasel-words such as “appears” and “apparently”. The
tone is
set in the first paragraph. It says that the “performance of” World
Trade
Center 7’s collapse is “of significant interest because it appears the
collapse
was due primarily to fire, rather than any impact damage from the
collapsing
[Twin] towers.” Overall, very little of this report is stated with
conviction.
FEMA's nonchalance about WTC-7’s collapse is stunning. Structural
failures of
this magnitude do not normally take place. In addition, there was
high-profile,
large-budget government agencies leasing office space in WTC-7 that
day.
Besides the SEC, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Department
of
Defense (DOD), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and New York’s Office
of
Emergency Management (OEM) were all tenants. None of the current heads
of these
departments have been vocal in demanding to know why this building
collapsed.
In addition, while some details have been released, a full accounting
of what
data these agencies lost has not been prominently reported.
Another source of curiosity is what the NYC Office of Emergency
Management
(OEM) was doing prior to 9/11/01. We know that the OEM took up the
entire 23rd
floor, serving as some sort of command center for then-Mayor Guiliani.
Also,
currently their website offers “Pet Preparedness” tips. However, their
activities at that time remain a source of widespread speculation.
With the two-year anniversary of the destruction of the World Trade
Center
arriving, the subject of WTC-7's odd disintegration is due some
scrutiny by the
liberal US media. To name just one, does Z Magazine believe that we now
live in
an era when tall steel buildings can collapse in large cities without
any
significant discussion of why? Even George Orwell might have trouble
imagining
that scenario.
*********************************
http://www.rainbowbody.net/Finalempire/
Final Empire Part Three: THE EXHAUSTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL EMPIRE
CHAPTER 8: POPULATION, POISONS AND RESOURCES
http://www.rainbowbody.net/Finalempire/FEchap8.htm
*********************************
*********************************
SPIRITUALISM THE HIGHEST FORM OF POLITICAL CONSCIOUSNESS
THE HAU DE NO SAU NEE MESSAGE TO THE WESTERN WORLD
http://www.ratical.org/many_worlds/6Nations/6nations1.html#part1a
**********************************
************************************
There Are Many Worlds of being and awareness
http://www.ratical.org/many_worlds/index.html
************************************
This ELECTION ISSUE of Grokking RealEyes Is posted:
(24sec load time @ 56k connection rate)
http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/realeyes.html
http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/realeyes.html#adrenal
Adrenal Fatigue: The Invisible Epidemic
http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/realeyes.html#anti
Anti-Christ was Wired!
http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/realeyes.html#believe
To Believe or not to believe that is the question
http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/realeyes.html#choice"
NOT VOTING! A Rational Choice for Nov 2nd
http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/realeyes.html#screem
Get Out the Vote & Screem
The AMERIKKKANS page has been "fixed/upgraded"
NEW: http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/amerikkkans.html#godly
(26sec Load time @ 56k connection rate)
NEW: http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/warinc.html
NEW: http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/skullandbones.html
NEW: http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/warbusiness.html
NEW: http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/qualified.html
|
